首页 > > 详细

代写IAB203-Assignment 2帮做asp编程作业、asp实验作业代做

IAB203 Business Process Modelling 
semester 1, 2020 
Assignment 2 
1 Key Info 
Groups groups of 2 or 3 students (independent of the groups of assignment 
1; register again on Blackboard) 
Deadline 31 May, 23:59 (end of week 12) 
Page limit unlimited. Suggestion: ≤ 20 pages for main report, 10-15 pages 
per guideline. 
Weight 40% 
Submit one PDF per group on Blackboard 
Questions contact Ryan Dunn, 
2 Introduction 
Emerging new Business models with the disruptive technologies and globalization of education 
providers are rapidly changing the shape of higher education industry. Unlike in the past, uni- 
versities cannot afford to simply depend upon the market or the government but need to take 
responsibility and initiative for adapting to the changing environment. Many universities have 
started organizational transformations and are applying business process management as a core 
mechanism, to assist them with these transformation journeys. 
For these very similar purposes, the University of ’s-Hertogenbosch (UH) has commenced a 
whole-of-university wide initiative, with the aim of making ‘true-impact’ to their business opera- 
tions. A main drive behind this is to identify areas for cost reduction and with a keen eye towards 
possible automation of business processes for long term, sustainable efficiency. 
The university has put together a project team; the ‘UXBPM’ team - to drive this initiative 
forward. The UXBPM team have recruited your IAB203 team as a group of junior Business 
Analysts, to help them with the initiative, specifically with the process modelling components. 
3 Case Organisation and Proposed Program of Work 
The University of ’s-Hertogenbosch (UH) located in ’s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands, was founded 
in 1895. It is an established university with over 45,000 students and more than 13,000 staff members 
(9500 academic staff and the rest professional staff). UH is among the top 100 universities in the 
world. It has 7 faculties: Medicine, IT, Science, Engineering, Arts, Social sciences and Business, 
each running multiple courses covering Bachelors, Honours, Masters and PhD programs. 50− 80% 
of the student cohorts in each course are international students from over 125 countries. 
As an outcome of its periodic corporate reviews, UH recognised the need to address opera- 
tional inefficiencies as part of the required organizational transformation. Given the age and size 
of the university, processes are complex and currently supported by a suite of in-house legacy 
systems, some too old to have any application programming interfaces (APIs). It was identified 
that administrative business processes at the university highly contributed to resource costs, time 
delays, diminished services, inefficiency, duplication, parallel effort across Faculties and Divisions 
and also created rework. In 2018 the university recruited ‘Systems Guru’ consulting to develop 
systems upgrades to the complex suit of already existing in-house processes and to automate some 
of the manual processes, which unfortunately ended with much project delays and failed project 
implementations. A detailed report done by UH’s external auditors strongly recommended that 
the university’s business processes be looked into and improved first, prior to any further systems 
implementations or upgrades. 
In recognition to this, in July 2019, Professor Smart, rector of UH, a position comparable to a 
vice-chancellor, proposed and laid the foundation for a university-wide process improvement effort 
with establishing the UXBPM team. The UXBPM team is expected to deliver a range of outcomes 
including improving user experience, visibility and control and reducing effort, cost and risk etc., 
through a program of process improvement initiatives. However, the UXBPM team is small with 
3 full time Senior Business Analysts experienced with business transformations and 2 part time 
junior analysts, and a minimalistic annual budget to spend on contractual positions. 
The UXBPM team report to the university board’s steering committee (this includes the rector, 
and 4 vice-rectors, deans of the 7 faculties and Division Heads of HR, Finance, IT, Asset man- 
agement and Student Services). While the majority of the steering committee have had no prior 
experience nor formal training on business processes management (BPM) they have seen other 
universities and institutions ‘do BPM’ and achieve diverse benefits from such, and want quick, yet 
robust outcomes coming through soon for UH as well. 
4 Your Project’s Role in the Program of Work 
At present, one of the senior Business Analysts and both of the junior analysts have already been 
allocated to address some critical issues that emerged in the recent systems upgrade at UH’s student 
enrolment support system. And the UXBPM team is under pressure to deliver the outcomes of a 
pilot project by end of August 2020, and detailed work plans for the new financial year by June 
2020 as well. 
Given the recent systems failures of the student enrolment support system, the student enrolment 
process was selected as the pilot project. But the UXBPM team is aware that moving forward, a 
more systematic approach to prioritising the target processes for process improvement is essential, 
and that they will need to get the buy-in and support from the business-area heads and other 
employees to roll things out. This includes upskilling selected staff from the business areas to be 
able to accurately capture their current processes in the form of business process models, identity 
areas of improvement, and when possible execute process improvements with the support of the 
UXBPM team. 
Business Process Modelling is a core component in all the process improvement and analysis 
techniques that the UXBPM team will apply and this is where you will contribute to. In particular 
your team has been asked to: 
• Derive process modelling guidelines that can be applied across UH for all the upcoming 
process improvements efforts at UXBPM. This should cater for both the experienced process 
modellers (i.e. the members of the UXBPM team), and the novel process modellers from the 
business areas (see Section 4.1 for more details). 
• Using an environmental scan of university processes and existing process architectures that 
are designed for the education Sector, derive a detailed process architecture. The process 
architecture should consist of a process landscape diagram, details of the set process hierarchy 
levels, and a decomposition of all processes to (at least) one further level beyond what is 
depicted in the process landscape document. (see Section 4.2 for more details). 
• Model the current student enrolment process (see a detailed description of the current state 
of the process in Section 5), applying the proposed modelling guidelines (and making further 
enhancements, as/if needed) (see Section 4.3 for more details). 
Present your findings in a report for your customer, UH. The structure of the report is up to 
you, although at least an executive summary, an introduction and a conclusion are necessary. For 
more details, please refer to Section 6. 
4.1 Modelling Guidelines 
UH’s intention is to train selected staff from each of the business areas (i.e. the faculties and 
divisions) at UH, so they can maintain the models that are created in this initial stage, and later 
on (in the long term) model and maintain their own processes themselves. The UXBPM team also 
require detailed modelling guidelines for their team’s internal purposes. Plan and develop 2 separate 
modelling guidelines for (i) internal UHBPM team use and another for (ii) UH’s business-area users. 
1. Design each set of guidelines, explaining how the following principals were considered: 
• Identifying purpose of the modelling guidelines; specific to the target audience. 
• Decisions on what content to have within the modelling guidelines, and in what level of 
detail/ abstraction. 
• Decisions on how to communicate the modelling guidelines to its users. 
• Governance around the modelling guidelines. 
• Also include any other considerations made at the design phase. 
2. Develop and present the modelling guidelines as appendixes within the report in a professional 
manner. The intention is to be able to immediately start using them at UH. 
Hint: Apply the “process modelling-guidelines development” framework introduced in week 10 
11. Also consider how the process hierarchy levels (of Section 4.2) may need to be integrated 
into the modelling guidelines. 
Table 1: Example of decomposed main process (extracted from APQC’s cross industry classification 
framework). 
Hierarchy ID name 
2.0 Develop and Manage Products and Services 
2.1 Govern and manage product/service development program 
2.2 Generate and define new product/service ideas 
2.3 Develop products and services 
4.2 Process Architecture 
For this part, you must complete the following: 
1. Explain how the main processes were identified. You will need to align things as best as 
possible to what you know of UH’s organisational context, and clearly articulate all assump- 
tions made. You may use a general environmental scan of university processes and/or apply 
a suitable reference process model. The final outcome has to be justified, well explained and 
presented visually in a process landscape diagram. 
2. The process hierarchy should be clearly presented and justified. The different levels and 
rational for each must be explained. 
3. All core processes should be further decomposed to one further level (adhering to the level 
definitions in your hierarchy), and presented in a hierarchical, indexed manner, as shown in 
the example of Table 1. 
Hint: Apply the information and guidelines introduced in week 8 9. 
4.3 Modelling 
Model the scenario of Section 5. 
• Describe the positioning of the enrolment process in the process architecture, including the 
relevant value chains in which the enrolment process is involved. 
• Model the control flow, the data and the resource perspective in BPMN; 
• Make sure that it adheres as much as possible to the as-is description in Section 5. However, 
as with any real-life modelling effort, not every aspect of the process is described, and not all 
described behaviour can be modelled. Document and motivate these cases in the report; 
• Make sure your model is structurally correct; 
• In the report, the model should be readable on A4 paper without zooming in; 
• The model should adhere to your own conventions, and the link with your hierarchy should 
be described. 
5 The as-is Student Enrolment Process 
The enrolment process starts when a student submits all the required forms and documentation to 
the online enrolment system. As a first step, the academic qualifications of the student are verified 
with an external agency, and the student is given an academic score. Then, at the closing date of 
applications, a selection is made of the students based on their academic merits. Then, the payment 
is performed followed by a visa application for international students, while in the meantime the 
advanced standing requests are processed. After all these steps have been completed, the student 
is registered for the course, and for the chosen units. At any moment students have been asking for 
updates on the status of their enrolment applications. At any time during the process, a student can 
withdraw the enrolment application for a full refund, or inquire about the status of the enrolment 
application. 
Once the payment has been processed, a visa sponsorship application is made with the im- 
migration department of the Australian government. If there is no reply from the immigration 
department within 20 days, a manual inquiry is made by the professional staff1. Once the approval 
has been received, the student is notified by professional staff and encouraged to lodge their visa 
application. After 30 days, the student is notified by an automatic system to inform UH of any 
status changes in the visa processing. Once the student has notified UH of the outcome, UH verifies 
the granted visa with the immigration department. Unfortunately, in the current situation, it has 
occurred that already granted visa were cancelled by the immigration department, in which case UH 
was notified, and provided the student with the option to withdraw the enrolment application with 
a certificate of acceptance, or to continue with a reduced list of units that could be taken online. 
If at any stage the student withdraws, UH notifies the immigration department and recommends 
cancellation of the granted visa. 
Professional staff assigns students an academic score based on several criteria, partly assisted 
by input of academic staff members. After the closing date of enrolment applications, the highest- 
ranking students are admitted, as many as there are places available. 
Payments are performed by an automated system that interacts with UH’s standard payment 
provider. Sometimes, transactions are successfully disputed well after being approved, which voids 
the payment retroactively, and consequently the application or enrolment. 
In their initial application, students can include requests for advanced standing of particular 
units. For each such request, professional staff identifies the unit coordinator and forwards the 
request to the unit coordinator for assessment. The unit coordinator might get in touch with the 
student to obtain more information regarding the advanced standing request; if the student does 
not respond within 10 working days, the decision will be negative. On a positive decision of the 
unit coordinator, the decision is registered in the student progress information system. 
Hint: unit coordinators are academic staff. 
1Which does not imply that the staff executing other core processes in UH are not professionals. 
6 Marking Criteria 
This is a draft of the marking criteria we will use to mark the second assignment, to give an idea what we’re looking for. If multiple boxes could apply, we generally 
choose the leftmost one. The points sum to 100 and count for 40% towards the unit score. No penalties apply for reports that exceed the page limit, as for this 
assignment, this is a soft limit. However, please note that you don’t need more pages to do the assignment. Plagiarism will be reported to the SEF student misconduct 
committee. 
Deliverable unacceptable needs work acceptable good excellent points 
0− 15 15 − 25 25 − 35 35 − 45 45 − 1 
Presentation professionalism format of report (structure, layout, grammar spelling, consistency, readability of model, . . . ) 8 
0 criteria met 1 criterion met 2 criteria met 3 criteria met 4-5 criteria met 
Modelling guidelines 
Design clearly articulated by explaining essential aspects such as purpose, target audience, content and level of detail, communication 
plans, critical governance considerations etc. 
10 
Guidelines for 
UHBPM team 
presented professionally, clear, suits audience, complete, appropriate level of detail, applied core design principles for modelling- 
guideline derivation 
Guidelines for 
business-area users 
presented professionally, clear, suits audience, complete, appropriate level of detail, applied core design principles for modelling- 
guideline derivation 
Process architecture 
Process architec- 
ture 
Derivation of the main processes clearly articulated, justified, supported by other evidences such as reference models and case 
extracts, depicted visually in a single page landscape diagram 
Process hierarchy clearly presented using text and visuals, justified, has an overview introducing all levels, each level clearly defined and explained. 6 
Landscape all core processes from the landscape decomposed one level further, presented hierarchical and indexed, they are clear, complete 
 
Modelling 
Control flow structurally correct, behaviourally correct, semantically correct, gaps filled and documented where appropriate 20 
Data every activity has the data inputs and outputs it needs, structurally correct, semantically correct, gaps filled and documented where 
appropriate 
Resources matches the given process description, structurally correct, semantically correct, gaps filled and documented where appropriate 5 
Embedding adherence to conventions, clear links to hierarchy, part of value chain(s) 5 
 
联系我们
  • QQ:99515681
  • 邮箱:99515681@qq.com
  • 工作时间:8:00-23:00
  • 微信:codinghelp2
热点文章
程序代写更多图片

联系我们 - QQ: 99515681 微信:codinghelp2
© 2014 www.7daixie.com
程序代写网!