FOUND022 English for Foundation Studies 2
Online Discussion 2 Student Information
Online Discussion 2 (20%)
You will be required to complete two online discussions, and each contributes 10% to your final course grade.
Online Discussion 2 Instructions:
1. Access the discussion forum via Moodle Forum.
2. You will receive a specific topic to discuss in the forum.
3. Follow the given instructions as provided in the discussion prompt.
4. Ensure your response is supported by evidence from the textbook and at least three other external sources, acknowledged by APA Style (7th edition) appropriately and accurately.
5. Ensure your response is at least 400 words.
6. Submit your responses within the given timeframe.
7. Engagement Requirement:
a. After submitting your response for each discussion, engage actively by
reading and interacting with your classmates' responses. Offer helpful feedback, ask questions, or share additional insights to encourage meaningful discussion.
b. You are required to engage with the posts of at least two classmates.
Marking Criteria:
See page 2. Make sure to understand these criteria to know what is expected for Online Discussion 2 posts.
Submission Date:
You will receive the deadline for completing the discussion in class.
Online Discussion 2 Marking Criteria
|
|
Unsatisfactory (
|
Needs Improvement (C)
|
Good (B)
|
Excellent (A)
|
Total
|
|
<49%
|
50%-64%
|
65%-79%
|
>80%
|
|
Content
Response should
be at least 400
words
|
Response fails to address all parts of the task requirements or only
partially fulfill them.
Response demonstrates a lack of understanding of the topic, with
irrelevant or insufficient information provided.
Response is not supported by the textbook or any other external
sources.
|
Response addresses most parts of the task requirements.
Response provides some relevant information but lacks depth or
coherence.
Response does not incorporate information learned from the
textbook although it may be supported by other external sources.
Sources have not been
acknowledged in APA referencing 7th edition.
|
Response comprehensively fulfills all parts of the task requirements, demonstrating a clear
understanding of the instructions.
Response presents clear and coherent content with relevant information.
Response is supported by
information from the textbook and at least three other external sources.
Sources are acknowledged using
APA referencing 7th edition
appropriately and mostly accurately.
|
Response exceeds expectations by not only fulfilling but also elaborating on all parts of the task
requirements.
Response exhibits a thorough and insightful understanding of the topic, with well-developed arguments.
Response is supported by
information from the textbook and three other external sources. These sources cover a variety of types,
giving a well-rounded view of the topic.
Sources are acknowledged using APA referencing 7th edition
appropriately and accurately.
|
/ 50
|
|
Replies to Posts
|
Replies provide minimal (fewer than three) or no engagement with
classmates' posts.
Replies lack substance or relevance in responses.
|
Replies engage with at least two classmates' posts but lacks depth or thoughtfulness in responses.
Replies may not address all aspects of the discussion.
|
Replies actively participate in the
discussion by responding to at least two classmates' posts thoughtfully.
Replies offer constructive feedback or contributes additional insights to the discussion.
|
Replies demonstrate a high level of engagement with at least two
classmates' posts, offering insightful and constructive feedback.
Replies are thorough, relevant, and contribute significantly to the
discussion.
|
/ 25
|
|
Clarity and
Language Use
|
Paragraphing is largely absent or ineffective, leading to text that is difficult to follow or understand
Responses contain numerous
grammatical errors and lacks variety in vocabulary.
Communication may be hindered due to poor language use.
|
Paragraphs are present but lack clear structure or coherence,
making the text somewhat challenging to follow.
Responses demonstrate basic
grammatical accuracy and
vocabulary usage, but with frequent errors or limited range.
Communication is somewhat hindered.
|
Paragraphs are used correctly to organise content, but may benefit from more attention to transitions and flow.
Responses show overall
grammatical accuracy and a varied vocabulary.
Responses may contain occasional minor errors, but communication is generally clear and effective.
|
Paragraphs are well-structured, clearly delineating ideas and
enhancing the overall readability and effectiveness of the text.
Responses display a high level of grammatical accuracy and a wide range of vocabulary.
Language use is precise,
sophisticated, and contributes to effective communication.
|
/ 25
|