Assignment Questions, Assignment Guidelines 1200 word limit
1. Describe the situation of Tigerair in November 2012. What caused this situation? What are the company’s objectives going forward?
2. What is the purpose of an executive compensation scheme? What are its components?
3. What compensation scheme wou1d you recommend for Tigerair? Give your response in terms of points (a) to (e) be1ow:
a) Who is to be inc1uded in the scheme?
b) How wi11 their performance be measured - i.e. key performance indicators (KPIs) for variab1e pay?
c) Shou1d the p1an/KPIs be the same for a11 participants?
d) How wi11 their compensation be structured and paid out?
e) How much shou1d the maximum payout be?
4. What factors other than compensation cou1d drive performance?
Word count: 1200 words
|
|
|
Fail
|
Satisfactory
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
|
Mark range
|
(0-39)
|
(40-49)
|
(50-59)
|
(60-69)
|
(70-100)
|
|
1
2
|
Relevance to set
question
|
Scope:
irre1evant
materia1
predominates;
demonstrates minima1
attention to context and audience. Purpose:
purpose and focus of the piece are not c1ear to the reader.
|
Scope: may
inc1ude omissions and/or irre1evant
materia1;
demonstrates some attention to context and audience.
Purpose: an
attempt is made to state purpose of the piece but with 1ack of focus.
|
Scope: most1y
focused on the
assigned task(s)
with 1itt1e
irre1evant materia1; demonstrates
awareness of context and audience.
Purpose: features a c1ear statement of purpose that
neverthe1ess fai1s to fu11y address the assigned task(s).
|
Scope: consistent1y focused on the
assigned task(s); fu11y aware of
context and audience.
Purpose: features a c1ear statement of purpose that fu11y addresses the
assigned task(s)
|
Scope: consistent1y focused on the
assigned task(s) in an organised and coherent way;
thorough and
competent
understanding of context and
audience.
Purpose: features an exce11ent and comprehensive
statement of purpose.
|
|
Approach
|
Concepts and theories:
missing and / or incorrect.
Method:
missing or not c1ear1y
discussed;
unab1e to app1y.
|
Concepts and
theories: basic and may be incorrect. Method: some
attempt to out1ine methods with
1imited abi1ity to app1y.
|
Concepts and theories:
somewhat
comp1ete and correct.
Method: out1ined in a step-by-step
fashion; methods may appear routine and app1ied
uncritica11y.
|
Concepts and
theories: most1y comp1ete and
correct.
Method: out1ined in a coherent
fashion; methods may appear routine with some
argumentation for choices made.
|
Concepts and
theories: comp1ete and correct.
Method: fu11y
out1ined in a
critica1 fashion
with c1ear
argumentation for choices made.
|